Class 2/21/13:

The discussion focused on the use of Wikipedia in the classroom and whether it is an appropriate tool.  For myself, the role of "casual observer" also applies here because Wikipedia, like most things, possesses a number of strengths and weaknesses.  The biggest problem I anticipate is the ability of anonymous users to add their own opinions and views to entries regardless of factual truth or objectivity. For example, the case of the former assistant to Robert Kennedy who found himself falsely connected with the assassinations of both JFK and RFK on Wikipedia is extremely problematic especially since this information was allowed to remain on the database until he became aware of it.  Topics that generate extreme controversy such as politics & government are the most susceptible to this kind of manipulation.   Opponents will attempt to pass off their views as "truth" and continually strive to forward their agendas regardless of objectivity or the facts.

On the flip side, Wikipedia is also a virtual airport, or in this case "infoport," where data from around the world arrives and departs in the continual renewal and improving of the material contained on the database.  Consequently, it offers a plethora of opportunities since it allows educators to find many separate sources discussing the same topics in the same place. As a result, it is incumbent upon educators to teach students how to not only effectively utilize the site, but also discern the quality and credibility of the sources from which the Wikipedia entries are composed.  This will require some individual lessons in order to be effectively taught, instilled and reinforced.